This will compare and contrast Saudi and Qatari communicate on Iraq While the positions of the two aforementioned countries have more(prenominal) than in common , there are also more or less substantial divergencys1 ) Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia maintains fairly good transaction with the coupled States Nevertheless , the country often voices independent opinions just about Iraki issue . Saudi leading are shake up at the escalating tensions in Iraq that pose a danger to voiceal security department and prosperity . King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia , at the Arab League top side that took place on 28-30 meet 2007 , voiced his concern oer the deepening crisis in Iraq where ` line of products is spilled between brothers under an illegal foreign occupation and [a] miserable sectarianism that threatens civil warfarefare (Ismael , 2007Therefore , it is possible to conclude that much(prenominal) a diplomatic intercommunicate was dictated not by hostility towards the get together States , and rather by a deep concern about the state of affairs in the region . Saudi drawing cards are come up aware of the fact that a fledged civil war in Iraq will severely expunge all the neighbour countries and result in a big movement of refugees , economical stagnation , and diminished international temper for all the countries in the region . Therefore , the country believes it is serious to inform the united States that they are not entirely quenched with the latest developments in IraqThere is another significant issue to retrieve about Saudi stance on Iraq . Being a predominantly Sunni Islamic nation , Saudis are unhappy with Iran-backed Shiites gaining more and more berth in Iraq . Saudi Arabia and Iran share a history of long-wearing rivalry for the position of the regional leader (Byman , 2007 . Thi s is the reason why Saudi Arabia is still r! eliefive of the American troops staying in Iraq until the smear stabilizes to an acceptable level2 ) QatarLike Saudi Arabia , Qatar is alarmed by the deepening crisis in Iraq .

The Emir of Qatar acknowledges the importance of a prompt outcome of the crisis for the regional stability . The major difference is that the Emir called upon the United Nations to disengage the leading role in such a resolution , while Saudi Arabia believes that it is the duty of the United States to bring wild pansy and stability to Iraq and voiced their support for Bush s `surge plans . At the General Assembly s 62nd annual ministerial meeting in September 20 07 , the Emir of Qatar verbalise that Iraq was too big of a crisis to be considered the responsibility of the United States or the Coalition of the uncoerced , and this was seen as a admonition of the American policy in the Middle East , contempt the fact that Qatar is an important helper of the United States and hosts one of its largest military machine bases in the region (Al Jazeera , 2007While Qatar maintains close relations with Washington , it was initially opposed to the thinking of American intervention and was reluctant to win necessary logistic support to the U .S . army at the initial stages of the procedure (BBC , 2002ConclusionConsidering...If you want to get a well(p) essay, order it on our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.