Social Work Essay -- Sociology, Social Division

This essay will discuss fond divisions social exclusion and social inclusion, of which there are galore(postnominal) definitions and interpretations. Social divisions and Social exclusion has been around for many years. Social exclusion was first noticed in France in 1970s in relation to good deal who fell outside the range of the social insurance system, such as disabled population, lone parents and the young unemployed (Townsend and Kennedy, 2004). Before 1997 Social exclusion was referred to as poverty, which means where people lack many of the opportunities that are available to the average person (Palmer 2010). However for the purpose of this assignment, it will focus on homelessness as a social division, the relationship between exclusion and inclusion, and how this relates to social work practice.Everybody in society is part of a social division. Thompson (2010) states that social divisions are composite plant and people are not only part of one group they are often par t of other groups, for a example a instauration seekers can be linked with social divisions such as poverty, unemployment and homelessness. Asylum seekers can also be marginalised by language barriers. Supporting Thompson (2010) is Armstrong (2006) who stated in 1997, 4.8 million adults suffered from five or more disadvantages of exclusion. Social divisions are class, race, disability, identify, gender and geographical environment, they are often problematic to individuals, groups and communities. Each Government which has come into precedent has tried to eradicate poverty, poor health, poor communities, discrimination and prejudice towards certain individuals and groups (Alcock, 2008). Social exclusion, which excludes people from society, can be categorised into people who are,... ...them (Dalrymple and Burke, 2006). Homeless people as already stated may have a number of disadvantages, one maybe a language barrier, English may not be their first language, therefore the social worker would find it useful to use an interpreter, which shows they value their cultural and want to help and support them. In conclusion the occasion of a social worker is increasingly significant when working with people who are socially excluded, due to multiple factors such as, poverty, homelessness, race, mental health and informal orientation. The essay has shown how people are effected by how Government oversee the country and how they encourage social workers to follow laws and polices, they need to believe in social justice and have an understanding of social divisions, social exclusion and how it informs their practice and then how peoples lives are impacted.

Means To Tragic Ends (oedipus :: essays research papers

Does man really have free will, or does free will lie within a system of limitations that gradually compose a web of circumstantial fate that ultimately cannot be torn apart? The events in both Oedipus The King and Antig hotshot controversially suggests that man ultimately chooses his own deeds and endures fate and the responsibilities for them. These events brought by fate are unmistakably aggravated by certain characteristics within the characters. Oedipus, from Oedipus The King, Antigone, and Creon, both from Antigone own such flawed characteristics that lead to their tragic ends.Oedipus possesses a multitude of characteristics, some of them common to other characters, but pride is exceptionally prevalent. This characteristic, which margins withutter arrogance, appears to be one of the dominant flaws that causes Oedipus&8217 tragic downfall. This is plainly established in the beginning of the play in which he states &8220I Oedipus whom all men call the great. (p11.8). This is st rengthened by the Priest&8217s replies of &8220...Oedipus, Greatest in all men&8217s eyes, (p12.40) and &8220Noblest of men (p12.46).However, pride is not the only characteristic which contributes to Oedipus&8217 tragic end. There exists his temper, which is initially presented in the argument between Teiresias and himself. After Teiresias speaks the truth as factual, Oedipus replies &8220Do you imagine you can always talk like this, and live to laugh at it hereunder? (p26.367) and then soon after calls Teiresias a &8220fool (p29.433). His temper is also exposed whenhe threatens to banish or kill Creon after Creon&8217s attempted reasoning. other contributing factor is his suspicion for others, this is evident where he questions Teiresias &8220Was this your own design or Creon&8217s? (p.27.377). He is falsely rationalizing that Teiresias is secretly plotting, in coalition with Creon, to cut down him. Moreover, Oedipus has an unrelenting pursuit for the truth, which is demonstrate d when he finally believes that he is the murderer and that Polybus was not his father. Nonetheless, he continues with his search with an extensive questioning of both his wife Jocasta and the messenger.Furthermore, Oedipus exhibits self-loathing and a desperation towards the end of the play. After the facts have been voiced, he desperately attempts to rationalize the evidence and states, &8220You said that he spoke of highway robbers who killed Laius. Now if he uses the same(p) number, it was not I who killed him. One man cannot be the same as many. But if he speaks of a man travelling alone, then clearly the payload of the guilt inclines towards me.

What Governments Are Not Essay -- essays research papers

What G overnments Are "Not"     In this essay I will be comparing the three economic systems Communism, Capitalism and Socialism and will explain differences and similarities along with illustrations of each system.     Communism is an economic system where the government owns and operates the means of production and distribution. It is also known as a command system because individuals cannot succeed others, the government controls all. Capitalism is an economic system where private individuals own and operate the means of production and distribution. People deem the freedom to own, choose, compete and earn a living but with little or no government help. They have the freedom to own, choose, compete and earn a living. Socialism is a mixed mart economic system. The basic means of production is managed and owned by the government, with the public owning and operating(a) many businesses. Cooperation is stressed over competition, goals a re high standard of living and economic security and high taxes provide free health care and education.     In communism the government controls the market while in capitalism private individuals own and control the market. Socialism is a mix of the two because the government owns and controls production but with public owning and operating many businesses. In all three systems the lack of competition hurts the quality of goods and profits go down. So...